skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Carmody, Rachel N"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ABSTRACT: Antibiotics in early life can promote adiposity via interactions with the gut microbiota. However, antibiotics represent only one possible route of antimicrobial exposure. Dietary preservatives exhibit antimicrobial activity, contain chemical structures accessible to microbial enzymes, and alter environmental conditions favoring specific microbial taxa. Therefore, preservatives that retain bioactivity in the gut might likewise alter the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Here we conduct in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experiments in mice to test the effects of preservatives on the gut microbiota and host physiology. We screened common dietary preservatives against a panel of human gut isolates and whole fecal communities, finding that preservatives strongly altered microbial growth and community structure. We exposed mice to diet-relevant doses of 4 preservatives [acetic acid, BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole), EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and sodium sulfite], which each induced compound-specific changes in gut microbiota composition. Finally, we compared the long-term effects of early-life EDTA and low-dose antibiotic (ampicillin) exposure. EDTA exposure modestly reduced nutrient absorption and cecal acetate in both sexes, resulting in lower adiposity in females despite greater food intake. Females exposed to ampicillin also exhibited lower adiposity, along with larger brains and smaller livers. By contrast, in males, ampicillin exposure generally increased energy harvest and decreased energy expenditure, resulting in higher adiposity. Our results highlight the potential for everyday doses of common dietary preservatives to affect the gut microbiota and impact metabolism differently in males and females. Thus, despite their generally-regarded-as-safe designation, preservatives could have unintended consequences for consumer health. 
    more » « less
  2. Although generally presumed to be isocaloric, dietary fats can differ in their energetic contributions and metabolic effects. Here, we show how an explicit consideration of the gut microbiome and its interactions with human physiology can enrich our understanding of dietary fat metabolism. We outline how variable human metabolic responses to different dietary fats, such as altered ileal digestibility or bile acid production, have downstream effects on the gut microbiome that differentially promote energy gain and inflammation. By incorporating host-microbial interactions into energetic models of human nutrition, we can achieve greater insight into the underlying mechanisms of diet-driven metabolic disease. 
    more » « less